It oughtn't to be so surprising that e-bikes are heavier on transmissions. It would be interesting to know the average (or RMS, maybe) power output at the sprocket, compared with a purely human powered bike. And it would be interesting to know if heavier chains are ever specified.
Playing fast and loose with some numbers, supposing an e-bike rider+motor allows for a time-averaged power output of 150W, that's somewhere between 175 and 270 times less than what my not-especially-powerful 55bhp motorbike will do, depending whether I ride it the way I usually do (fairly slow and puttery) or if I caned it all the time (red mist, evening jaunts and motorway dashes).
But the chain on my motorbike is massive: it weighs about 2kg! A Sram single speed chain is only 330g; a typical 9-speed chain about 300g. So a chain that is objectively only six times more massive can handle 175 times more power. It lasts for 10,000, maybe 15,000 miles, yet 'only' costs about seven times more than a 9-speed chain.
A piddly Honda CBF125 puts out over 50 e-bikepower, yet takes a DID 428 chain that costs less than £20.
I realise that we have a lot of derailleury e-bikes going around, but for the hubgeared ones, are makers simply using the wrong equipment?