https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/feb/26/vaccine-etiquette-vomo-and-judging-the-unjustly-jabbed
When someone jumps the queue and gets vaccinated, do you condemn their selfishness, admire their chutzpah, ask for tips? When a friend or relative is way ahead of you in the queue, are you happy for them or resentful? Is yearning for vaccines a legitimate existential response or is it just a symptom of Vomo – fear of missing out on a vaccine?
These and other questions came to the fore this week as stories emerged of subterfuge, queue-jumping and tension along humanity’s new faultline, the jabbed and not-jabbed.
“You’ve stolen a vaccine from somebody that needs it more than you,” an Orange County sheriff’s deputy in Florida told two women, aged 33 and 44, who had put on bonnets, gloves and fake glasses to try to appear older and dupe their way to a second vaccine dose.
Sir Richard Leese, the head of Manchester city council, said people were “fiddling the system” – some have pretended to be social care staff – to cheat their way into priority categories. “People should not go before they are called to go as you are taking a slot away from someone in greater need,” he said.
The ethical failure of such behaviour is obvious, but less clear is what you do or say to someone who you know gamed the system – a topic that has hummed on social media and in advice columns.
Full disclosure: A skiing friend (possibly soon to be ex-friend) of mine down south gleefully reported on our Whatsapp group that he had done something along these lines - even quoting the URL that he had been given "by his hairdresser". Another friend in the group checked out the URL and found that it clearly stated that you should only proceed if you met one of a number of conditions - none of which the first guy met: he's not in the current priority age range, not involved in the Covid response effort, and he doesn't have any underlying complications. First guy had ignored that and continued to successfully book his two appointments.
Now, I know it's pretty poor of the NHS not to have better screening/validation on their booking system but when, in the midst of a global pandemic in which older and/or more vulnerable people are still falling seriously ill and dying, you are specifically requested to act honestly and honourably and you choose not to do so then I do believe that a lot of the fault lies with you. It's a bit like blaming people for being burgled if they leave their front door open: they may be guilty of a degree of contributory negligence, but the burglar didn't have to walk in and steal their TV - he could have chosen to walk on by. (A truly honest person might even have gone to check whether the householder was at home, and if not then alerted the police to the apparently insecure property.)