CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Debate!

Do we need a coronavirus thread?

(5710 posts)

No tags yet.


  1. wingpig
    Member

    "...disgust of Pringle clad..."

    Back home the antics of golfists to get in the way of people walking include building a golf course on top of an internationally-recognised walking route following the path of an old railway. They recently extended their displacement scheme,trying to double the distance people have to walk on a footway-less country road to cross it and reach the path on the other side.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  2. Murun Buchstansangur
    Member

    Has there been a recent outbreak of a stupidity virus?

    "The 5GBioShield was recommended by a member of Glastonbury Town Council's 5G Advisory Committee, which has called for an inquiry into 5G.

    One of nine external members, Toby Hall, said: "We use this device and find it helpful," and provided a link to its website, which describes it as a USB key that "provides protection for your home and family, thanks to the wearable holographic nano-layer catalyser, which can be worn or placed near to a smartphone or any other electrical, radiation or EMF [electromagnetic field] emitting device"."

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-52810220

    Posted 3 years ago #
  3. Blueth
    Member

    I've been doing a bit of exploring of late and followed a path (shown on the OS map) through the Bank HQ and Gogarburn golf club. Very nice and I recommend it as a route. It is only necessary to cross a few yards of grass, the rest is service paths for the course.

    I got a rant from one member of staff (the other two were more reasonable though all appeared to be unaware of the 2003 Act) about private land and cycling on a golf course (I hadn't and they were not in a position to see whether I had or not). I did not wish to get involved in an argument so left at a suitably calm point in the discussion. I felt it politic not to point out that they had built an elevated tee on the line of the path as I didn't want to wind them up.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  4. ejstubbs
    Member

    @IWRATS: So do members of the public have the right to walk on golf courses? In short, yes.

    Interesting.

    This is the notice posted that I saw at Swanston yesterday:

    It doesn't actually say "keep off" but: "the golf courses will no longer be available for you to roam freely and enjoy as you have for the past 9 weeks" could easily be read that way, especially if you are sufficiently put off by it not to go on to read the next paragraph. It seems to conflict somewhat with the Director's words quoted in the article: "They are entitled to walk on it, but they must treat it like a golf course." That statement strikes me as being much more concise, factual and to the point.

    Being charitable (or applying Hanlon's Razor if you prefer) I would put it down to poor wording by someone whose primary role does not encompass the creation of clear and unambiguous communications* rather than deliberately trying to put people off accessing the course at all. But still I think it would be interesting to get the opinion of the council's access officer on it.

    I can understand course managers being annoyed about people taking the mick and using their golf courses for family picnics (as I saw on Mortonhall at least once) and other barely-exercise-related activities. But most of those abuses are fairly clearly not within the scope of responsible access as laid down in the access code anyway, and the course managers would be entirely justified in asking people to desist.

    I have to say I'm not entirely comfortable with people expressing gratitude to golf clubs for being 'allowed' to do what they have a legal right to do. More appropriate would be to express gratitude to the government that passed the legislation that gave them that right. I rather hope that the club that received a cheque in thanks from a local resident who had never walked on the course before lockdown has had the decency not to cash it.

    * As compared to, say, government ministers and officials whose wages are funded from the public purse...

    Posted 3 years ago #
  5. LaidBack
    Member

    Part of this attitude is from the antique views swayed by the fact that in England you have no such freedoms.

      • Some areas of land, such as gardens, parks and arable land, are excluded from access by the public. Specifically, there is land in England on which the right of access is not available at any time, even if it appears on maps of access land. It is generally obvious on the ground and includes private buildings and the land attached to them; land within 20 metres of a house; quarries, golf courses and race courses and arable land, among other areas.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  6. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    @ejstubbs

    You may need a stiff drink and a series of cold compresses to read it but Andy Wightman's The Poor Had No Lawyers gives a great insight into how Scotland's land has been accessed and forbidden over the years.

    The 'thanks for our legal rights' thing is an echo of an ancient and ongoing war.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  7. gembo
    Member

    The chap who sent the cheque to Old Ranfurly (doubt they need the cash but you never know) WAS A member of 3 other clubs. Sheesh. Though sometimes there is a distinction between the course and the clubs that use it like Publicly owned courses like Braiids or indeed Bellieisle in Ayr where my old boy was pro at the end of his career (and no longer needing to dig ditches)

    Posted 3 years ago #
  8. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    Digging ditches in boulder clay is the hardest physical work I have ever done.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  9. LaidBack
    Member

    FM giving latest guidance.

      Not to roam more than 5 miles
      Meet one other household but no more than eight - 2m apart
      Don't share plates - don't use their bathroom. Don't go in their house at all.

    FM very nervous that things could kick off again.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  10. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    'I am nervous and I need your help' is just the right message. But it will get out of hand no doubt.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  11. Ed1
    Member

    So the recommendations is only 5 mile cycle from house seems a bit short

    Posted 3 years ago #
  12. gembo
    Member

    Need photos of Porty beach

    Dell parcel was POM POMs. Sons pal in lockdown in Newcastle. She is bored so making Pom poms and PomPom Bombing her pals. For this i cycled to the Dell (twice)

    Also - first time ever my IPad has ever told me it is too hot to go on

    Big logs over the Harlaw car parks - will see if they get shifted

    Posted 3 years ago #
  13. LaidBack
    Member

    Cycle distance advice is tricky.
    Orginally it was around an hour which is 6 to 10ish max miles away from home.
    Then Jason Leitch said you should go for half hour walk/cycle - that was a few weeks ago after CMO got the chop.
    Then it was fact you could go out more than once.

    Worried that single occupancy cars will be considered PPE equipment.

    One household per day.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  14. steveo
    Member

    So, the 5 miles is that how far you can drive to get your exercise or how far you can exercise?

    Posted 3 years ago #
  15. MediumDave
    Member

    @steveo

    It's in the Getting Around section of the phased lockdown guidance

    https://www.gov.scot/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-framework-decision-making-scotlands-route-map-through-out-crisis/

    page 36 onwards.

    The exercise bit says "Consistent with the rules and guidance that are applicable to any activity in this phase: Unrestricted outdoors exercise adhering to distancing measures."

    Make of that what you will! I'm just following my instincts and assuming that I can cycle as far as I want for my exercise...

    Posted 3 years ago #
  16. steveo
    Member

    For all that Boris was pilloried for his less than crystal clear message, this isn't much better.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  17. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    My understanding was that you shouldn't be more than five miles from your house. From the point of view of limiting the virus's travel that's what makes sense. Local exercise for local people.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  18. fimm
    Member

    You can travel for 5ish miles and then do some other exercise. So you could cycle for 5ish miles and then go for a walk.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  19. steveo
    Member

    Or drive to the Pentlands (Bonaly is just in range) and go for a walk? For example.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  20. urchaidh
    Member

    This distance thing is a big issue for me. The places I would go locally with the kids are now rammed and so we don't go, other than when we nip down first or lat thing, or on those glorious days when the weather is a bit crap. So we end up hammering off into East or Midlothian looking for a bit of space, going further than we probably should.

    I appreciate we're really lucky to live near a beach, and that I sound like the classic grumpy Porty misanthrope, but people currently driving over to Porty to hit the beach need to rule2 the rule2 off.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  21. gembo
    Member

    No matter how clear advice might be no one will follow it in the post DC universe

    Posted 3 years ago #
  22. Morningsider
    Member

    If you can drive five(ish) miles - this is advice rather than the law - then anyone with a car who lives in Edinburgh can go anywhere in the city. Chuck in the ability to meet other households outdoors (plus reopened drive-thrus) then beaches, parks and the like are going to be crazy this weekend.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  23. fimm
    Member

    If it is "you should never be more than 5 miles from your house" then that is more restrictive than the lockdown we have had up to now, which had no such restriction.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  24. gembo
    Member

    @fimm, no you could not drive at all before unless you felt like it. Now you can drive 5 miles but obvs go further if you feel like it

    Posted 3 years ago #
  25. steveo
    Member

    Well no, before you could cycle further than five miles from your house. Now one interpretation would suggest a big cycle (anything worth getting the bike out for) would, and presumably there for always has been, breaking the rules?

    Posted 3 years ago #
  26. Murun Buchstansangur
    Member

    They've out-contradicted Boris.

    Quite an achievement.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  27. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    Epidemiologist not optimistic about the UK of GB&NI's prospects. R- number not low enough and test and trace system too young to have meaningful impact when lockdown is eased and ignored.

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/may/28/coronavirus-infection-rate-too-high-second-wave

    I think he's basically saying we're getting a summer holiday after which a load of people will die and we'll go back into lockdown.

    Posted 3 years ago #
  28. I were right about that saddle
    Member

    The exercise advice seems pretty clear;

    you can now travel short distances for outdoor leisure and exercise but should remain in your local area, suggested to be five miles from your house

    Don't go more than five miles from your house.

    https://www.gov.scot/news/lockdown-begins-to-ease-in-phase-1/

    Posted 3 years ago #
  29. chdot
    Admin

    “Don't go more than five miles from your house”

    SO

    Has the rule/optimist suggestion changed?

    Or is it just that (some of) ‘we’ have interpreted things to suit ourselves??

    Posted 3 years ago #
  30. Murun Buchstansangur
    Member

    "Don't go more than five miles from your house."

    If you aren't going to come within at least 2 metres of another human being, and touch nothing between leaving and returning to your own front door, why?

    Posted 3 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply »

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin