@IWRATS: So do members of the public have the right to walk on golf courses? In short, yes.
Interesting.
This is the notice posted that I saw at Swanston yesterday:
It doesn't actually say "keep off" but: "the golf courses will no longer be available for you to roam freely and enjoy as you have for the past 9 weeks" could easily be read that way, especially if you are sufficiently put off by it not to go on to read the next paragraph. It seems to conflict somewhat with the Director's words quoted in the article: "They are entitled to walk on it, but they must treat it like a golf course." That statement strikes me as being much more concise, factual and to the point.
Being charitable (or applying Hanlon's Razor if you prefer) I would put it down to poor wording by someone whose primary role does not encompass the creation of clear and unambiguous communications* rather than deliberately trying to put people off accessing the course at all. But still I think it would be interesting to get the opinion of the council's access officer on it.
I can understand course managers being annoyed about people taking the mick and using their golf courses for family picnics (as I saw on Mortonhall at least once) and other barely-exercise-related activities. But most of those abuses are fairly clearly not within the scope of responsible access as laid down in the access code anyway, and the course managers would be entirely justified in asking people to desist.
I have to say I'm not entirely comfortable with people expressing gratitude to golf clubs for being 'allowed' to do what they have a legal right to do. More appropriate would be to express gratitude to the government that passed the legislation that gave them that right. I rather hope that the club that received a cheque in thanks from a local resident who had never walked on the course before lockdown has had the decency not to cash it.
* As compared to, say, government ministers and officials whose wages are funded from the public purse...