“@chdot (and others): I think there is scope for a major PR disaster here - the worst thing we could do right now is to lend ammunition to the antis who say "It cost all that money and they aren't using it". It may be a stretch, but if we get this wrong, we could set back efforts to introduce safer infrastructure for years/ ever.“
Yes but.
I’m not (or even close to) saying ‘don’t bother to use them they are not good enough’.
I am saying don’t ‘shame’ people who don’t use them in certain places.
There will be some bike riders (probably not CCEers) who will avoid all/most of them for some (misguided) reasons.
Generally, it really isn’t about ‘us’.
It’s about people new to cycling - or at least new to being willing to cycle on busier roads than they used to.
For this, the quality and usability of the infrastructure is important.
The real issues are not whether people on bikes don’t use bits of cycle path/infra - in the same way some already stick to the road rather than use paths at the side of the road that stop at every side road - and so (potentially) ‘annoying’ a motorist or two.
This is all new to (almost) everyone.
Most of the new stuff is significantly better than previously (for people on bikes) AND (generally) we want it to become permanent AND better (especially if it really isn’t particularly good in ‘temporary’ guise).
Clearly there are people against all this for various real and made up reasons.
Most aren’t persuadable for the reasons that they a) ‘don’t like change’ b) see anything that ‘curtails their freedom’ as WRONG.
Unfortunately Covid means that all sorts of ‘street’ businesses are suffering. Anything perceived as ‘reducing footfall’ will be resisted - especially if the ‘more cyclists/pedestrians means more customers’ is still some way off.
There are more people using bikes, but a significant proportion (understandably) are for leisure/exercise in places away from lanes at side of (not as busy as they used to be) roads.
It’s complicated.
It’s reassuring that key politicians and Gov policies are generally (now) in favour of ‘active travel’, ‘slower speeds’, ‘road space reallocation’ etc.
People will soon be much more worried about whether they can fly off for their summer holidays than whether wands will be (permanently) replaced with solid kerbs.