CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » General Edinburgh

“Active Travel Action Plan 2023 – Delivering the City Mobility Plan“

(24 posts)

No tags yet.


  1. chdot
    Admin

  2. Morningsider
    Member

    Thought I would give this a quick once over this morning, skipping the introductory blurb the first thing that jumps out at me is the claim that:

    Since 2010, approximately 130km of network have been either upgraded or built.
    I mean - really!? Would we not have noticed?

    Grr - anyway, onwards...

    Posted 1 year ago #
  3. Morningsider
    Member

    Okay, nothing much to disagree with in the walking chapter. Better pavement maintenance, tighter corner radii, more seating, lots of dropped kerbs, improved crossings with more "green man" time, improvements for wheelchair users, a focus on high traffic areas, priority at junctions including continuous pavements.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  4. Frenchy
    Member

    I mean - really!? Would we not have noticed?

    I suspect "upgraded" is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that one!

    Posted 1 year ago #
  5. Morningsider
    Member

    Oh dear - from the off the cycling chapter includes multiple references to the "challenges" of creating continuous networks due to "limited road space".

    Posted 1 year ago #
  6. chdot
    Admin

    “nothing much to disagree with“

    That’s good, but as I’m sure you’ll agree, a plan/policy doesn’t mean anything will happen.

    Also with existing practices, might not mean any changes in actual delivery.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  7. chdot
    Admin

    “130km of network have been either upgraded or built”

    I think the k is a typo.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  8. Morningsider
    Member

    Still going - that 130km figure is wild. It includes the entire length of the Union Canal in Edinburgh and the western part of the Water of Leith path, Cramond foreshore, the NEPN...the actual Forth Road Bridge!

    Posted 1 year ago #
  9. Morningsider
    Member

    Meadows-Union canal planned completion date July 2025!

    Posted 1 year ago #
  10. Morningsider
    Member

    Overall, the cycling chapter is pretty decent. Really just bringing together policies and plans we already know about. No new projects mentioned that I can see and delivery dates seem to be slipping further into the future.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  11. Morningsider
    Member

    Wild cost estimate:

    We estimate delivering every action in this plan to its fullest extent would cost £824m - £1,124bn (at 2022 prices).

    That's not far off what it cost to build the Queensferry Crossing and its connecting motorways, but for projects that largely involve moving some kerbs and rejigging some junctions.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  12. Morningsider
    Member

    Okay, that was only a brief skim through - but there really isn't anything particularly new in there. I suppose it does pull together strands from other recent plans into one place, which is helpful. Ultimately though, it is the same list of projects we have been looking at for the last decade or so attached to some warm words.

    As @chdot says - delivery is everything. Given that we seem to have been going backwards over the last few months, with campaigners expending their energies on trying to maintain what we have, I can't say I feel massively inspired.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  13. chdot
    Admin


    We estimate delivering every action in this plan to its fullest extent would cost £824m - £1,124bn

    So

    A decent hire scheme is small change…

    6.1 The option appraisal sets out a preferred option for a cycle hire scheme consisting of 140 docking stations, 1,120 bikes and 420 e-bikes (Option E) and that the scheme is procured and operated on the basis of a Managed Service
    (Option1). This would require initial capital investment of £8.36m and an annual revenue subsidy of £2.08m.

    The remaining funding includes one off allocations of £0.5m in 2023/24, £0.5m in 2024/25 and £0.210 in 2025/26 and this has been put forward by officers as a proposed revenue budget saving in the Revenue Budget Framework 2023-27 report to the Finance and Resource Committee on 7 February 2023.

    http://citycyclingedinburgh.info/bbpress/topic.php?id=17899&page=51#post-366121

    Posted 1 year ago #
  14. LaidBack
    Member

    "At present, CCT proposes restrictions on through traffic for Bank Street, Market
    Street and George St. Other key routes which could now be considered would
    be North and South Bridges (Bridges corridor), Cowgate, the Lauriston Place
    corridor and Lothian Road."

    Caveat on this is it may be just part-day.

    I think that if through north/south car journeys via city centre are not a thing then traffic on Comiston etc would also reduce. If however there is dubiety over when restrictions are in force then nothing will change and it may even increase congestion. (People set off and then U turn as they do at Holyrood Park gates)

    Posted 1 year ago #
  15. Yodhrin
    Member

    Additional caveat being the pretty clear implication that if they restrict the bridges corridor in any way whatsoever, the price is they'll continue to treat Holyrood Park as a main through route for cars. The idea of forcing through traffic out of the city centre in its entirety just seems beyond them.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  16. chdot
    Admin

    Cllr Arthur said together the Active Travel and Public Transport action plans were “a gamechanger” for the Capital. He said: “Edinburgh will easily be leading Scotland if we get these plans approved – and that's just the start. In terms of sustainable transport, if we pull these things off, we will be one of the leading European cities." He said that, taking into account money made available by the Scottish Government, the city’s budget for active travel alone over the next ten years would just over £1 billion. “I can’t find any city that has bigger or more ambitious plans. The Active Travel and Public Transport action plans together, I think, are going to transform Edinburgh for the better, cut congestion, and make it easier for people to come here and spend time here.”

    https://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/news/transport/edinburgh-transport-blueprint-public-transport-plans-will-make-edinburgh-one-of-leading-cities-in-europe-4005748

    Posted 1 year ago #
  17. chdot
    Admin

  18. chdot
    Admin

    A plan in search of a funding source

    Bigger

    Posted 1 year ago #
  19. chdot
    Admin

  20. chdot
    Admin

    #EdinWebCast #CityMobilityPlan

    Q: Cllr Munro (Con) says council should implement majority views in consultns

    A: Council must be honest about overall options for city, and why particular local decisions taken
    @lmacinnessnp adds that consultn is foe ideas/comments, not referendum

    https://twitter.com/spokeslothian/status/1621171409522200578

    Posted 1 year ago #
  21. Morningsider
    Member

    Cllr Munro (Con) says council should implement majority views in consultns

    Councillor Munro was elected on 17.6% of first preference votes in the Morningside ward, taking until the seventh round of counting to meet the threshold.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  22. chdot
    Admin

    @CllrScottArthur says #CongestionCharge *will* be considered in future, but now is too early ... needs more thought & expected scotgov policy shifts

    @CllrCMiller (Grn) therefore agrees to postpone this

    https://mobile.twitter.com/spokeslothian/status/1621186654257004545

    Posted 1 year ago #
  23. Morningsider
    Member

    The Scottish Government's "policy shift" is not due to be published until 2025. See page 6 of Reducing car use for a healthier, fairer and greener Scotland, which states:

    Our route map sets out the actions we will take between now and 2030 to support each of these four behaviours. In the near-term these are predominantly actions to encourage alternative behaviours. We are, however, committed to exploring options to further discourage car use, including developing a Car Demand Management Framework, based on further research into equitable options to discourage car use, by 2025.

    So, well and truly kicked into the long grass.

    Posted 1 year ago #
  24. chdot
    Admin

    Review today at TEC

    Some random thoughts -

    Currently watching TEC Committee

    Plans without costings

    ‘A lot can be done without expensive engineering’

    ‘Lots of minor things need TRO processes’

    ‘14,000 roadworks per year’, “mind boggling” says SA

    Lots of ‘some of the things we did in the past could have been done better’

    Also ‘if we’d known North Bridge would be shut for so long, we could have done traffic surveys’

    “Princes Street completely unacceptable” - trip hazards etc says Head of Place

    ‘Now working together more across CEC depts’

    Etc etc

    Glacial really

    —- —— ——

    Spokes thread

    Edinwebcast

    #7.1 #MobilityPlan & 7.2 #FutureStreets massive policy docs, will discuss together
    -> https://t.co/RHstjVc7aI

    Q: Cllr
    @jomowat
    says local issues #potholes #accessibility should come first

    A:
    @CllrScottArthur
    says #accessibility+#congestion+#emissions require fewer cars

    https://x.com/SpokesLothian/status/1753027381533483381?s=20

    Posted 10 months ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin