CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Debate!

The Future has Two Wheels

(9 posts)

No tags yet.


  1. Min
    Member

    And is a car.

    Of course.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-14060276

    "Push the wheel - which is more of an iPad-inspired joystick - forward and it surges ahead into a sprint at speeds of 25mph (40km/h) or more, depending on how the computer is programmed, delivering a 25 mile (40km) range per charge.

    Travelling at such speeds may seem hazardous, given that the car has been designed without bumpers, air bags or any other conventional crash protection devises."

    Posted 12 years ago #
  2. chdot
    Admin

    "
    The EN-V is basically a widened Segway, enclosed in a bubble
    "

    Mmmmmmmmmmmmmm

    Posted 12 years ago #
  3. TwoWheels
    Member

    Oh dear lord. I saw a Segway, for the first time, while I was on vacation on Cape Cod. I have to admit, there was a real temptation to push it over just to watch it's self-righting capabilities, like a Weeble or something.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  4. Sheesh. There's so much in that article to ridicule. Okay, so there are some benefits (specifically for possible disabled users, as mentioned in the piece), but going on about it being small and light so easy to take on a train, or small enough to park easily, or being capable of 25mph (but obviously being dangerous because it has no airbags)... That's all just a 'bicycle' isn't it?

    Posted 12 years ago #
  5. Min
    Member

    "That's all just a 'bicycle' isn't it? "

    You have to hand it to them - any idiot can reinvent the wheel. Only the really special can reinvent two..

    Posted 12 years ago #
  6. wingpig
    Member

    Ah, but with a bicycle you're not completely enclosed, and thus exposed to dangerous fresh air and inspiring breezes.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  7. Smudge
    Member

    Wonder if the segway technology could be adapted to suit an inline wheel application...

    You could run a much more aerodynamic bodyshell (more speed/range), and lean into corners for comfort, then enable the magic balancing trick only at low speeds, thus saving the power required to run it and making the whole thing more efficient (and gaining, again, more speed/range)... and it would be a "proper" two wheeler ;-))

    Posted 12 years ago #
  8. wingpig
    Member

    Making it single track would disable it from being able to use the wheels to regain fore/aft balance so it would need the ability to waggle its wheels to allow it to either scuttle sideways or allow the wheels to tilt left/right relative to the body of the vehicle (to shift the CoG relative to the centre of rotation) to regain port/starboard balance.

    If it was able to switch between having the wheels parallel (for low speeds) and inline/single track mode (for higher speeds) it'd be a bit more Q-worthy.

    Still not as fancy as the adaptive-tread monowheel thing Iain (M) Banks mooted in Against a Dark Background.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  9. Smudge
    Member

    Ahh, that makes sense, clearly I hadn't thought about *how* the thing balances lol
    (wanders away blushing)

    Posted 12 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin