CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Cycling News

Citycycling Issue 6

(24 posts)
  • Started 12 years ago by Wilmington's Cow
  • Latest reply from Morningsider

No tags yet.


  1. Online as planned. I'm as stunned as anyone else...

    http://www.citycycling.co.uk

    Posted 12 years ago #
  2. wingpig
    Member

    "Copenhagen" link on the front leads to Issue 5's Madam Raven section.

    BAGH. Missed a typo. "otehr" must be in Chrome's dictionary for some reason.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  3. Arellcat
    Moderator

    Decision: sit at my desk and read .cc, or sit at my desk and do work...

    Posted 12 years ago #
  4. SRD
    Moderator

    I'm at a workshop....both seems to be an option :)

    Posted 12 years ago #
  5. kaputnik
    Moderator

    My experiences of work-related workshops is that they involve neither work nor shopping. Nor metal bashing or the use of big tools, which would be far more enjoyable way to spend a day.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  6. SRD
    Moderator

    all true, but in this case it is preferable to sitting in office and dealing with freshers....

    Posted 12 years ago #
  7. recombodna
    Member

    Dunno where Anth went cycling in Amsterdam. Maybe a few streets in the very centre of the city. I've been cycling in Amsterdam for the last 20 years and can safely say there are a plethora of segregated cycle lanes both in the city and between cities. ;-)

    Posted 12 years ago #
  8. By no means universal though...

    Posted 12 years ago #
  9. ruggtomcat
    Member

    because in holland they have zoned transport, everything gets mixed together as soon as you enter local residential areas, with small roads, a rough surface and 20kmph limits. as the limit goes up so the traffic becomes more segregated until you get to the motorway where the cyclepath is separated by a 6ft concrete wall.

    I suspect Anth was put off by cycing in Dam traffic, which is like driving in Rome on a miniature scale. Hairy for us rule bound island types.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  10. My experience of cycling in the 'dam

    Covered a fair expanse of the city by bike. Around our hotel, near the station, there were a lot of segregated lanes - riding out to the Rijksmuseum, not so much.

    Interesting point ruggers, thinking back to it we took small roads a lot of places, whereas the bigger roads saw more segregation. Marc van Woudenberg (Mr Amsterdamize) was very enlightening over a couple of beers.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  11. Arellcat
    Moderator

    ...you get to the motorway where the cyclepath is separated by a 6ft concrete wall.

    A cycle path last month:

    That's the A64 near Tadcaster, and that traffic is doing 70mph. :-/

    Posted 12 years ago #
  12. ruggtomcat
    Member

    with a nice fence for the smearing!

    Posted 12 years ago #
  13. gembo
    Member

    Some suggestion from Madam Raven that bent users may have enlarged prostrates (in the future).

    Tadcaster - home of the great Samuel Smith's. Used to by-pass it on way to Flamborough Head.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  14. chdot
    Admin

    This is a slightly better one (wider) - near Leven. BUT not far enough away from the traffic to avoid spray!

    Posted 12 years ago #
  15. Morningsider
    Member

    The advice given by Madam Raven on the legality of children cycling on the pavement is wrong.

    Anyone riding a bike on a footway (pavement) in Scotland is committing an offence under the provisions of Section 129(5) of the Roads (Scotland) Act 1984. These offences are usually enforced through a police officer issuing a fixed penalty notice.

    Police would normally use their discretion when dealing with children cycling on the pavement - i.e. not do anything.

    While fixed penalty notices can be issued to those of an age of criminal responsibility (i.e. 8+ in Scotland)*, the sanctions for failing to pay such a notice are normally enforced through the adult justice system. It is difficult to envisage a situation where failure to pay a fixed penalty notice issued for cycling offences is enforced through the children's hearing system. In practice this means that sanctions for cycling offences normally apply only to adults.

    *The Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2010, Section 52 establishes that no-one aged under 12 can be prosecuted for an offence. However, the age of criminal responsibility remains at 8, i.e. anyone aged under 8 cannot be guilty of an offence, as set out in Section 41 of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  16. recombodna
    Member

    Where does the land reform act stand on this?

    Posted 12 years ago #
  17. wingpig
    Member

    Wherever it likes?
    *tshhh*

    Posted 12 years ago #
  18. @Morningsider

    Indeed, and I was hoping that someone might pick her up on it (and no, Madam Raven is not me...)

    Posted 12 years ago #
  19. Instography
    Member

    Good magazine Anth. Enjoyed it. A fine distraction from work.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  20. wee folding bike
    Member

    Cops ride on the pavement in/out of our school car park. It's across the pavement, not along it.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  21. Morningsider
    Member

    WFB - riding or driving across a pavement is legal (Roads (Scotland) Act 1984, S 129 5(a)).

    My last post is (ahem) not too clear. What I should have said is - anyone under 12 can ride on the pavement without fear of prosecution.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  22. wee folding bike
    Member

    Well I'd suggested the access to property option before but there was a feeling that it only applied to motor vehicles.

    Next time I see the local bike cops do it I can ask them.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  23. wee folding bike
    Member

    BTW. PDF version is handy, I can put it on an iPad and read it anywhere.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  24. Morningsider
    Member

    WFB - yeah, I remember seeing that somewhere in the forum as well. Anyway, I checked it out and the law states that the following is an exception to the general prohibition on riding/driving on a pavement:

    "where and in so far as the vehicle or animal is being taken across the footway, footpath or cycle track"

    So it all depends on your definition of "taken". Personally, I would see that as allowing a bike to be ridden across a pavement rather than pushed, because it is the same exception that allows drivers to cross the pavement, and no-one makes them get out and push.

    Posted 12 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin