CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Debate!

Road Safety - a Canadian view

(8 posts)

No tags yet.


  1. chdot
    Admin

    "

    Spend Wisely to Improve Safety

    To use taxes for the greatest public benefit, local governments need an integrated plan for traffic safety that takes into account the community as a whole.

    Building obstacles to impede traffic is a sheer waste of taxpayers' money. The Canada Safety Council urges municipalities to invest instead in proven safety measures.

    Resources for traffic enforcement in many communities have diminished to the point of being inadequate. Preventive traffic enforcement must become the number one priority.

    Instead of turning streets into playgrounds, develop recreational grounds and facilities where children can play safely, away from traffic.

    Address specific traffic problems with intelligent, cost effective solutions that will not compromise safety or penalize law-abiding citizens. (e.g. yield signs, turning and parking restrictions, traffic signal timing, illumination)

    Invest in public education to change perceptions, behaviours and attitudes that lead to collisions.
    "

    http://canadasafetycouncil.org/traffic-safety/traffic-calming-vs-safety

    Posted 13 years ago #
  2. LaidBack
    Member

    Instead of turning streets into playgrounds let's speed up the traffic?

    penalize law-abiding citizens
    That phrase is always used to describe drivers inconvenienced / victimised / criminalised by not being to drive just as they feel.
    (In UK there are many driving who shouldn't be. 12 points doesn't always mean a ban it seems.)

    I'm not going to click on the link!

    Posted 13 years ago #
  3. crowriver
    Member

    Invest in public education to change perceptions, behaviours and attitudes that lead to collisions.

    Sounds like a plan.

    Okay then. I suggest the following 'education' measures.

    Any driver who is responsible for a minor collision (causing no injury) spends 12 hours in a stocks on the street corner, whereby the public can 'educate' the driver in the error of their ways.

    Any driver who is responsible for a collision which causes injury to a third party shall (unless seriously injured themselves) be imprisoned for at least 6 months, whereby the other inmates can 'educate' the driver. They will also be banned from driving for 5 years following the end of the prison sentence.

    That should reduce the accident rate and prove very 'educational'.

    Posted 13 years ago #
  4. LaidBack
    Member

    Maybe bit drastic...

    They could start by banning drivers with more than 12 points.

    Can't find this year's stats but more think they are similar.
    One in four drivers escape 12 point ban

    "Over 10,000 drivers who were due a 12-month ban were let off by magistrates, including one 27-year-old from Teeside who had amassed an astonishing 54 points – more than four times the maximum permitted under the rules."

    Posted 13 years ago #
  5. cb
    Member

    That Canada Safety Council link is pretty depressing reading.

    Having been in Toronto earlier in the week it's laughable to think that removing a few traffic calming measures is going to make any difference to journey times.
    Rush "hour" in Toronto apparantly starts at 7am and runs through to about 1pm. Thinks are OKish for about 90mins before it all kicks off again at 2.30pm.

    Ottawa was better, but still pretty awful from a traffic point of view. They love their cars.

    Posted 13 years ago #
  6. Min
    Member

    "penalize law-abiding citizens
    That phrase is always used to describe drivers inconvenienced / victimised / criminalised by not being to drive just as they feel."

    Clearly the problem is being caused by people who are not in cars. If those people were in cars they wouldn't get killed when being driven into by someone in another car. If everyone drove or was driven at all times then there would be fewer deaths and injuries in the city. The answer therefore, is obviously more cars.

    Posted 13 years ago #
  7. chdot
    Admin

    "The answer therefore, is obviously more cars."

    AND more roads.

    Posted 13 years ago #
  8. steveo
    Member

    If the question is purely around safety then yeah that is the answer but as usual in life, its more complicated than that, people actually want to get to places.

    Posted 13 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin