Must be the best biased article on cyclIng in a mainstream newspaper I have ever read.
Well it must be biased because I couldn't find anything wrong with it and it covered a wide range of issues with remarkable clarity!
I must admit I hadn't realised that a cycle death in Glasgow had been one of the reasons for DB to set this thing rolling.
Perhaps the most important thing about this article is that it points out that a large proportion of people who ride bikes also drive - and also that a lot of people would like to cycle but don't feel ready/safe.
I'm not going to pretend that CCE is in any way 'representative' but the spread of types of cyclists (and fact that they are not 'just' roadies or commuters or MTBers) is quite impressive and also the number of 'I'm new to this so...'.
For years there have been surveys which show that 'people say that they would like to cycle, but'.
In the past it's been easy to think 'they are only saying that because they think they should' or 'most people are just too lazy' or even 'that's fine, but there will never be the sort of joined-up-infrastructure to encourage some people to cycle'.
I really think things have finally changed ( - again, perhaps, etc. - ). Politicians really are realising that current cyclists get a rough deal and that there really are people who would like to cycle - and maybe even leave their cars at home, reducing congestion and air pollution and improving their health (all with long term social and personal benefits).