Interesting article because it straddles a couple of stereotypes while defying others. For instance: "I can guarantee now – absolutely 100% guarantee – that not one learner driver out there thinks cyclists just bounce when they get hit by a car ... I can similarly guarantee that not one learner thinks it’s OK to run over one"
Not one, really? Because when I learned to drive I had a pretty intolerant attitude towards slower road users for a start...
yet we're told that his list of misdemeanors (some of which are offences) is
"absolutely 100% accurate applied to the vast majority of cyclists. Most cyclists do at least one of these things every time they go out,"
Stereotype much? It's tempting to write off this sort of stuff as weakminded Daily Hail material, but there are interesting nuggets to glean all the same:
"most probably aren’t even aware they are wrong or causing inconvenience. The rest know exactly what they’re doing and don’t care."
You see when your worldview is twisted just so, it somehow makes sense that people should care that they are inconveniencing their betters and do something about it (even though mostly cyclists are just motorists who are too smart or simply can't be bothered to sit in queues).
So yes, if the fifty-odd cyclists I see on my commute were holding up the author by taking their cars that would be fine, but because they left them on the drive they "know and don't care" that they are causing inconvenience.
Might see if I can drum up the energy to do him a response.