CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Cycling News

Driver thought cyclist was a bollard

(4 posts)

  1. crowriver
    Member

    A rather novel excuse. Didn't stop him from running the cyclist over and killing him. Would he have driven into bollards so casually? Also the court debated whether the cyclist should have been on the A1 at 4am...

    http://www.worksopguardian.co.uk/news/local-news/driver-killed-a1-cyclist-1-5207118

    Driver got a 12 month ban and 200 hours community service.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  2. ????

    Surely the question he should have been asked in court was simply, "So do you routinely drive straight into bollards?"

    Posted 12 years ago #
  3. ARobComp
    Member

    I feel that this is sort of misleading too - It's clearly a part of the A1 which allows cyclists on it. He was wearing adequate reflective and lights (although what that means who knows- however we know he was visable at 150-200 yards)

    Horrid story. really makes me worry.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  4. LivM
    Member

    I suppose the point about bollards is that you know that they are on the verge, and therefore will not be in your way when you drive past them. The driver perhaps observed it, dismissed it as "not a thing to worry about" and looked further ahead. Whereas actually a bike moves, is in the carriageway and clearly needs to be manoeuvered around.

    Not at all to defend vehicular manslaughter, but I can understand the psychology of the driver - observe ("red shiny thing"), assess ("won't be in my way"), move on. A bicycle is a strange thing to encounter on that road at 4am, perhaps his brain was playing Occam's razor.

    Posted 12 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin