“IWRATS' proposal involves not paying any more tax”
Is that to appeal to the populist vote or those who are quite adept at avoiding tax?
Obviously not paying out £39bn (or any other made-up sum) has its attractions but I’ve never been clear how much of it would actually be stopped by a ‘hard brexit’.
Leaving with ‘no deal’ doesn’t remove any previous/current obligations/bills - unless of course the process is akin to bankruptcy.
Hardly the best position to be in when looking for investment or trade deals...
IF 39bn is savable, it would seem that the brexiters have failed to capitalise on this by suggesting what could be done with it.
Income tax cuts giving ‘ordinary’ people a bit of extra cash (even if it only pays for higher prices)? Infrastructure investment? (I’m not going to pretend that anyone would propose bicycle networks - too European.)
Even the fallback position of ‘give it all to the NHS’ doesn’t seem to be being suggested.
Maybe there is no free money.