CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Debate!

"New roads cause traffic not economic growth, says CPRE"

(7 posts)

No tags yet.


  1. chdot
    Admin

    FT story (paywall) should open from this link

    https://twitter.com/john_lauder/status/843774268672491520

    "

    Building new roads causes more traffic and congestion but does not boost local economies, according to a study of 80 UK road schemes by the Campaign to Protect Rural England.

    Although congestion falls, this is shortlived, according to research by Transport for Quality of Life, which was commissioned by the CPRE.

    "

    Posted 8 years ago #
  2. chdot
    Admin

  3. chdot
    Admin

    "

    New roads built in England have almost all failed to either relieve congestion or boost local economies, according to what campaigners claim is the biggest ever independent review of completed schemes.

    A study of 86 road schemes commissioned by the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) found most roads increased traffic while destroying the countryside.

    ...

    The annual budget for roadbuilding is set to triple to £3bn by the end of the decade under the road investment strategy announced in 2014. The government says its strategy will encourage economic growth and support a “free-flow core network” of one mile-a-minute journey times. But the CPRE said that the research showed that road building over the past two decades had failed to deliver on similar aims.

    "

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/20/new-roads-create-more-traffic-fail-local-economies-cpre

    Posted 8 years ago #
  4. neddie
    Member

    I notice the Dept. of Transport were quick to "dispute the findings".

    I think it's also misleading for them (FT, DoT, KPMG consultancy) to talk only about 'new' roads generating new traffic. This implies that road upgrades do not generate new traffic, which I believe they do.

    An 'upgrade' is adding capacity (even if it only increases speed & not the number of lanes) and therefore it will attract new traffic.

    Posted 8 years ago #
  5. chdot
    Admin

    Interesting to read some of the Guardian article comments.

    Quite a lot of hostility/presumption that this is about 'country people/landowners' wanting to keep people out.

    Also high (for the G I would have thought) accepting that cars are inevitable (+ more people, more cars) so have to be catered for.

    Obviously some comments about 21st C solutions being different.

    Posted 8 years ago #
  6. chdot
    Admin

  7. gembo
    Member

    That research is far too clever and accurate to be accepted.

    Posted 8 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin