CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Debate!

“ ‘Computer says road’: call for change to ‘crude’ planning models”

(2 posts)
  • Started 2 years ago by chdot
  • Latest reply from CocoShepherd

No tags yet.


  1. chdot
    Admin


    Traffic modelling spreadsheets that “almost always tell us that ‘computer says road’” should no longer be used by planners and more money should be spent on building places geared for walking, cycling and public transport, according to a report by the Create Streets campaign.

    The attack on “big road urbanism” argues that the Department for Transport cost-benefit modelling tools for new roads fail to “properly capture non-travel-time benefits, such as health, wellbeing and the environment … so the answer will always be to build more or bigger roads”.

    The Department for Transport strongly denied any bias towards road-building in its modelling, and a spokesperson said: “The environment is at the heart of our proposed transport schemes, and we always encourage sustainable options such as public transport, cycling and walking.”

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/feb/23/computer-says-road-call-for-change-to-crude-planning-models

    Posted 2 years ago #
  2. CocoShepherd
    Member

    The Department for Transport strongly denied any bias towards road-building in its modelling, and a spokesperson said: “The environment is at the heart of our proposed transport schemes, and we always encourage sustainable options such as public transport, cycling and walking

    Hilarious/derisory

    Posted 2 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin