CityCyclingEdinburgh Forum » Debate!

"Inactivity 'killing as many as smoking'' "

(8 posts)

No tags yet.


  1. chdot
    Admin

    "
    SCPHRP (@SCPHRP)
    18/07/2012 07:14
    UK news: 'Inactivity 'killing as many as smoking'' http://bbc.in/OS3rjR #publichealth #physicalactivity #exercise

    "

    "The Lancet study found people in higher income countries were the least active with those in the UK among the worst as nearly two thirds of adults were judged not to be doing enough."

    Posted 12 years ago #
  2. chdot
    Admin

    "

    ISPAH (@ISPAH)
    18/07/2012 07:39
    Lancet Series on Physical Activity published today - open access http://bit.ly/MHjssl #ISPAH #ICPAPH #health

    "

    Posted 12 years ago #
  3. kaputnik
    Moderator

    Let's build more roads.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  4. cb
    Member

    Covered on Today this morning, and the point was made (by Lord somebody) that Copenhagen spends £40 per person on cycling and walking infrastructure compared to less than £1 in UK cities.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  5. kaputnik
    Moderator

    They also get a lot more for their £1 than we do... We could spend £40 and just end up with a lot of paint, badly signed "shared use" pavements, unfriendly junctions, rumble/slidey strips on otherwise good paths and red-chipped surfaces that you can't see against the black surface of the tar.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  6. Claggy Cog
    Member

    http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2012/air-pollution-deaths-united-kingdom-0420.html

    Respiratory disease caused by pollution is a huge contributory to premature deaths as well, so a combination of inactivity, smoking and pollution is a deadly cocktail. As a cyclist pedalling in and around the city I am so aware of the crud that I am having to breathe from vehicular exhausts. The recent Legionnaire's outbreak in Edinburgh gives some idea of what pollutants/airborne bacteria can do. I thought this a very interesting piece of information.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  7. Claggy Cog
    Member

    Actually thinking about it, more cars = more pollution = fewer people as more die of respiratory related disease. Win, win, win for those who insist on using their car just to drive to the local park to take their dog for a walk. Reduction in population numbers = bonus.

    Lose, lose, lose for those dedicated to cycling for whatever reason who have to cycle through the "soup" of particulants/pollution caused by the mindless drivers.

    Posted 12 years ago #
  8. cc
    Member

    People in cars breathe in lots of polluted air as their car's air intake is well positioned to take in the output of the exhaust pipe of the car in front. Cyclists' heads are above the worst of the exhaust. ISTR the BMA assessing the risks of cycling - including this risk - a decade or two, and finding that even taking all the risks into account, cycling was still about twenty times healthier than going in the car.

    Posted 12 years ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Reply

You must log in to post.


Video embedded using Easy Video Embed plugin