Caution, this thesis is only based on a couple of days of proper riding 'weirdness', plus reactions on short test rides...
Riding the Noomad for a wee while I was expecting to get some funny looks and comments from cyclists. But even stopped in a full ASL no questions have been forthcoming (more often the reaction is 'I must get away quicker than that' before fumbling to get into the clipless pedals by which time I'm halfway down the street - well, it put a smile on my face).
So anyway, any interactions have been with Joe Public. A van slowing alongside me, the passenger window coming down and a shout of "Where'd ye get that???!" followed by a discussion on how much fun it was to ride ("Aye, it loks great fun pal" said non-sarcastically); schoolkids on the Innocent Path steeping to the side 30-40 yards before you're actually on them and simply staring down at the wheels; or the chap walking with a buggy, and another kid on a scooter, and another on her bike, moving over to let me by and commenting "That's a cool bike mate".
To my point. We're told, and have debated so often here, that 'normal' clothing etc etc etc ois what encourages people to cycle, just through 'seeing' how normal it all is. 'Seeing' that a cyclist is just a human being. But here's the thing, riding something weird (and Laidback and Roibeard might say the same, I know for certain the 'bents get a lot of interest) stirs people up so much that not only do they notice you, but they want to speak to you to find out about it. And as soon as you have niteraction you have a connection on the basic human level.
Both the Copenhagenize and the 'Weirdize' (as I'm defining it) are predicated on the same presumption, that Joe Public is encouraged to cycle by seeing that other people, just like them, cycle. I'm not convinced by that on any level, to be perfectly honest, and think that the cycling environment itself is a greater determining factor. But if the main premise of Copenhagenization is humanisation, then surely weirdness followed by interaction is even more likely to engage those outside of the cycling world?